Home Sociology  &  Culture  Journal Issue Abstract


2016/4 (Vol. 7)

  • Pages : 104
  • ISBN : 9782130734512
  • Publisher : P.U.F.

Email alert

Your alert request has been correctly taken into account.
You will receive an email when new issues are put online.


Previous Pages 377 - 392 Next



This paper aims to analyse the work of prison management teams. Working in organizations that are mainly “autoregulated” by prison guards, governors’ teams have had to cope, for the last 15?years, with a heightened control exercised by the central administration. This “regulation of control” (Reynaud, 1988) is inter alia justified by the endemic phenomenon of overcrowding and the increasing interdependency between prisons and their environment. Despite the constraints implied by these shifts, prison governors preserve some auto­nomy through two types of deliberative practices allowing them to influence –marginally and ethically– prison organizations and policies. The first one, called practical wisdom or prudence (Champy, 2012), lies in the subtle bypassing of the rules in uncertain situations; the second one, called cunning, or ruse (Lécu, 2013), consists in denouncing the hypocrisy of some political discourses with the help of external partners.


  • management teams
  • prison management
  • prison policy
  • shifts
  • regulation

To cite this article

Christophe Dubois, “ Prudence et ruse comme capacités d’action managériale et politique. Le cas des équipes de direction pénitentiaire belges ”, Sociologie 4/2016 (Vol. 7) , p. 377-392
URL : www.cairn.info/revue-sociologie-2016-4-page-377.htm.

© 2010-2014 Cairn.info
back to top

Message sent

Your email address has been saved.
We will notify you when this article becomes available in English.