Home Philosophy Journal Issue Abstract

Revue internationale de philosophie

2014/1 (No 267)

Email alert

Your alert request has been correctly taken into account.
You will receive an email when new issues are put online.


Previous Pages 37 - 63 Next



Social psychologists claim that the empirical evidence for the existence of behavioral dispositions is very poor, and several philosophical psychologists have understood this to mean that there is little empirical evidence for the existence of virtues, especially as Aristotle thought of them. By contrast, I think just the reverse is true – that is, the evidence from social psychology is very good news for a theory of the virtues like Aristotle’s. Along with a negative thesis about behavioral dispositions, the evidence from social psychology also suggests a positive view of personality and character, and the basic points of this positive view are ones that Aristotle himself fully embraced. If that is correct, it is time to move beyond recent philosophical debates about the merits of social psychology and Aristotelian virtue theory as allegedly rival ways of understanding human behavior.


  1. 1. Two approaches to personality: dispositionism and situationism
  2. 2. Social psychology, personality theory, and the virtues
    1. 2.1. Situationism and personality theory
    2. 2.2. Implications for virtue theory
  3. 3. Personality theory, virtue theory, and Aristotle
    1. 3.1. Inner states and construal of situations
    2. 3.2. Inner states and the characterization of actions
    3. 3.3. Action, construal, and consistency
  4. 4. Some caveats
  5. Conclusion

To cite this article

Daniel C. Russell, “ Aristotelian Virtue Theory: After the Person-Situation Debate ”, Revue internationale de philosophie 1/2014 (No 267) , p. 37-63
URL : www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-philosophie-2014-1-page-37.htm.

© 2010-2014 Cairn.info
back to top

Message sent

Your email address has been saved.
We will notify you when this article becomes available in English.